I have a 1997 Acura 2.2 CL with 58,000 miles. Manual recommends change at 90,000 miles. I want to know if the age of the car requires it to be changed at a lower mileage, or if the change is required only based upon the miles on the car. Thanks for your help, especially if you're a mechanic!|||This is a 14-year-old car. She could be Married in Tennessee!
All kidding aside, we're assuming it's the original belt. Rubber oxidizes and ages just Sitting Out. Tires have date codes for this--even Not used, the rubber can age and make them, both, unsafe.
Your T.B. prevents catastrophic valve damage in a Honda (I know; I lost my Civic by assuming the belt was good.) They are only $20 or so; easy to replace by yourself. Even if you pay a 'wrench, it is Cheap insurance against expensive work that may happen, soon.|||Welcome !
See chart - https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B1NaWpH鈥?/a>
Take the value - 90,000 or 72 months, best bet!!
Master Tech Lee
http://www.fixcar1.com|||Seven years is the safe limit. Mileage has less to do with it than age does. There was a question here recently about their timing belt that had failed at under 50K miles....|||The Gates book states to change the timing belt at the recommended mileage interval or every 72 months, whichever comes first.
"Avoid Costly Engine Damage;Change Your Timing Belt At The Recommended Interval Or Every 72 Months, Which Ever Comes First."
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment